RETHINKING THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS? CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF THE 2030 GOALS.

Zuzana HUDCOVÁ, B.A.

Diplomová práce

CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS

Abstract:

This master thesis provides a critical analysis of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through an examination of 113 scholarly articles from prominent databases. The data analysis reveals significant concerns, with internal clashes (28%) and lack of integration (13.33%) identified as key issues. Proposed solutions include introducing additional indicators to foster synergy and cross-sectorial partnerships. Challenges associated with the current global system (11%) underscore the need for a redefined distribution of responsibilities and collaborative efforts. Inefficient monitoring mechanisms (7.77%) point to the necessity of an independent body to enhance transparency. Addressing vagueness (6.66%) involves advocating for SMART targets, while the lack of accountability (4.44%) calls for an investigative body inspired by human rights models. A conceptual flaw (3.33%) emphasizes prioritizing environmental goals, and non-legally binding commitments (3.33%) suggest translating key SDGs into jus cogens norms for enforceability. These findings contribute to structural recommendations aimed at refining the SDG framework and advancing global sustainable development by 2030.

Abstract:

This master thesis provides a critical analysis of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through an examination of 113 scholarly articles from prominent databases. The data analysis reveals significant concerns, with internal clashes (28%) and lack of integration (13.33%) identified as key issues. Proposed solutions include introducing additional indicators to foster synergy and cross-sectorial partnerships. Challenges associated with the current global system (11%) underscore the need for a redefined distribution of responsibilities and collaborative efforts. Inefficient monitoring mechanisms (7.77%) point to the necessity of an independent body to enhance transparency. Addressing vagueness (6.66%) involves advocating for SMART targets, while the lack of accountability (4.44%) calls for an investigative body inspired by human rights models. A conceptual flaw (3.33%) emphasizes prioritizing environmental goals, and non-legally binding commitments (3.33%) suggest translating key SDGs into jus cogens norms for enforceability. These findings contribute to structural recommendations aimed at refining the SDG framework and advancing global sustainable development by 2030.

Keywords

Criticism of sustainable development goals, critical analysis, SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals

Jazyk práce: angličtina

Datum vytvoření / odevzdání či podání práce: 11. 12. 2023

Obhajoba závěrečné práce

• Vedoucí: doc. Mgr. Miroslav Syrovátka, Ph.D.

UNIVERZITA PALACKÉHO V OLOMOUCI

Přírodovědecká fakulta

Magisterský studijní program / obor:
Mezinárodní rozvojová a environmentální studia / Mezinárodní rozvojová a environmentální studia